Lockdown?

I've tried not to comment here on the lockdown but it's reached a point where I just have to. The original idea sort of made sense. It was to reduce the burden on the already failing NHS, huge numbers were predicted and full panic mode was engaged. The trouble is that simply didn't happen, numbers never got anywhere near the predicted levels, all those costly MASH style portable hospitals only ever had a handfull patients between them. (where did they come from at such short notice, it's almost like they had them and the thusands of extra beds they put up in community centres just waiting). So now to second lockdown. Yes numbers went up, although considering they are including heart attack victims and motorcycle accidents thats hardly a supprise. Officially the two biggest problems were pubs and universaties... yet instead of just shutting these we the "fire break" lockdown. This is where the problems start. First off the only country showing continually falling numbers is the one that didn't have any lockdowns. Seconly I might just wear the second lockdown if the so called leaders made rules that made some remote bit of sense. AS it stande I can go to tesco to buy bread but I can't buy the toaster in the next aisle. Fair enough not have the seperate electrical good shop open but having the shop already open and stopping them selling one is just bonkers. This is the problem. Our leaders are making such bonkers rules you have to wonder if they are really capable of running a bath never mind a country. Clearly this lot are in the fruit loop I'm a squirrel group and not fit to be out without a carer. Roll on next elections a lot of people will be having a serious think about how to vote, and who to vote for. Time we had a common sense party!